See fla. Const., art. Iii, § a.Continue reading“florida senate approves bulk sms ireland house amendments to mini-tcpa”email linkedin twitter facebook share may , written by: emanuel l. Mcmiller, Michael p. Daly and marsha j. Indych Category: automatic telephone dialing system, telemarketing topics: ftse texas district court rejects “influence liability” workaround to fcc exemption for research and surveys recent decision from the u.S. District court for the northern district of texas reaffirms the fcc’s interpretation that calls and text messages regarding consumer surveys and other market research do not qualify as restricted “telephone solicitations” or “telemarketing” under the tcpa or its implementing regulations.

Although the outcome in this case is a positive development, organizations that engage in these types of communications should continue to monitor and assess the state of the law in other jurisdictions.In hunsinger v. Dynata llc, the plaintiff was a serial pro se tcpa litigant whose phone number was registered on the fcc’s national do-not-call list at all relevant times. No. -cv--g-bt, wl , at n.D. Tex. Feb. , . Mr. Hunsinger alleged that he received a single call from an unidentified caller asking him to visit dynata’s website.